Search for: "Town of Atherton"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2009, 5:54 pm
Atherton has agreed to payt $230,000 to settle a sexual harassment and discrimination lawsuit a former police officer filed against the town and one of its employees. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 10:27 am
San Jose's a pretty big town, and there's crime there and in the surrounding suburban towns if silicon valley, no question. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:16 am
Atherton is a small town with a small budget. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:29 am
Town of Atherton v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
Abbott Town of Atherton v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 4:38 pm
For example, coming in second to Grant in terms of total sales volume was Mary Gullixson ($208 million), an Alain Pinel agent who works in Atherton and surrounding towns. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
In reaching this decision, the First District disagreed with a recent decision by the Third District, Town of Atherton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:43 am
Atherton was executed on December 5, 1640. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 11:59 am
The lawsuit was over the publication of various facts about the plaintiff, including "an image of a 30 year-old drivers license," plaintiff's "resettling in Atherton"—the richest town in the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:05 pm
Jerry Carlson was on the Atherton Town Council and allegedly retaliated against Mr. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
The Court also rejected Petitioners’ attempted reliance on the market participation doctrine as an exception to preemption, and in doing so it disagreed with the reasoning of and distinguished a recent Third District decision on that subject, Town of Atherton v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 12:49 pm
While the Board claims that its analysis, based on Eel River, is merely offered “as the agency authorized by Congress to administer the Interstate Commerce Act, [and, thus,] ‘uniquely qualified’ to address whether § 10501(b) preempts state law,” Docket, p. 5, citing Town of Atherton v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 6:59 pm
The Times database lets you search by zip code; I scoured the list for interesting donors from towns like Woodside, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Atherton, Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Saratoga, where for a million bucks you can get a super nice townhouse; I also checked out Marin County and the tonier areas of San Francisco. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:40 am
And Atherton, CA, a Silicon Valley town with a median home price of $6.7 million, is at least thinking about getting Teslas for the police. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Additionally, Friends of the Eel River introduces more legal complications for the planned $64 billion bullet train between Los Angeles and San Francisco, as it appears to require compliance with CEQA and makes the project vulnerable to additional litigation. [1] See Town of Atherton v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Additionally, Friends of the Eel River introduces more legal complications for the planned $64 billion bullet train between Los Angeles and San Francisco, as it appears to require compliance with CEQA and makes the project vulnerable to additional litigation. [1] See Town of Atherton v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
§§ 10101 et seq.) preempt the application of [CEQA] … to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
